Site icon Dakota News Network

New Study Shows EPA “Half RIN” Proposal Would Keep U.S. Soybean Demand Strong

web-photo-template-onecms-1000-x-563-px-39423492

December, 10, 2025. Washington, D.C. A new economic analysis finds that EPA’s proposal to assign 50% of the Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits to imported biofuels and biofuels made from imported feedstocks compared to domestic would strengthen domestic soybean markets while preserving flexibility in biomass-based diesel sourcing. The study, funded by the United Soybean Board and conducted by World Agricultural Economic and Environmental Services (WAEES), evaluated feedstock demand, farmer income, and commodity pricing under different final decisions for EPA’s proposed 2026–2027 Renewable Fuel Standard volumes.

The half-RIN proposal ensures that imported feedstocks remain available for biofuel producers but reduces policy incentives to substitute foreign oils for U.S. soybean oil. According to the study, the option still allows imports to be used but makes domestic feedstocks, including soybean oil, more competitive. EPA’s pending volume rule already projects record biomass-based diesel use, which would support domestic crushing and soybean oil utilization.

“Soybean farmers support strong biomass-based diesel markets,” said ASA President Caleb Ragland and Kentucky farmer. “This study confirms that when policy values domestic feedstocks, rural communities benefit. The half RIN proposal still gives biofuel producers flexibility, but it keeps American soybeans competitive and keeps more value here at home.”

Researchers modeled three scenarios and found that the half-RIN approach delivers the greatest economic benefit to U.S. soybean farmers across every major metric evaluated. Removing the 50% credit reduction, even if EPA later adjusts blending volumes, would reduce the value of U.S. soybeans, lower demand for domestic soybean oil, and increase reliance on imported used cooking oil and tallow as biofuel feedstocks.

If the RVO is finalized without the half RIN:

Even if EPA attempts a compromise:

The study shows the half-RIN proposal is the most advantageous option for U.S. soybean farmers, maximizing domestic feedstock use while maintaining market flexibility. Imported materials remain part of the mix in every case, but the half credit better aligns RIN generation with domestic availability and supports farm income, crushing capacity, and rural economic growth.

The full report, Implications for Biofuels and Feedstock Demand of the Granting of Full or Half RIN Credits on Imports, is available upon request.